Nigerians
are generally perceived as a happy people, a people known for wearing a
smile even in the face of adversity. That’s why the late Afro-Beat
musician and social activist, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti, described them as a
“shuffering and smiling” people. What is less known, or less discussed,
about them is that they are also a very hopeful people. Ordinarily, hope
is the feeling or anticipation that your situation will improve, that
events will turn out in your favour or for the better, or that you will
be able to get what you want or desire. For Nigerians, however, hope is a
philosophy of survival, a philosophy that makes the sufferer anticipate
a better tomorrow, even when there is no practical basis for
improvement or change for the better.
This basic philosophy of hope is
underscored by spiritual and political leaders, who have turned hope
into a mantra, that is, a word or formula that is chanted as in an
incantation or prayer. This is particularly true of religious leaders,
who constantly fuel the hope machine by making people feel good about
tomorrow. A typical message of hope routinely comes from the church or
the mosque at the beginning of a new year. Accordingly, on January 1,
2013, the General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God,
Pastor Enoch Adeboye, told his congregation that the New Year would be
better than the previous one. 2013, he predicted, would be a year of
“signs and wonders”, a year when many would have reason to say “hope
rising”. He added: “God says, He will speak peace to your storms;
certain individuals have stagnated for some time, the reasons for your
stagnation will become known, will be addressed and will be eliminated,
therefore progress will follow.”
To be sure, there are discriminating
religious faithful who know how to interpret and manage their pastors’
sermons about hope and progress. Unfortunately, many churchgoers in
Nigeria do not have these skills, owing partly to illiteracy and
ignorance and partly to blind faith. Sadly, some pastors often take
advantage of such church members by claiming to know why their progress
had been retarded. The widely reported cases of Edet Etok-Akpan and
Okechukwu Ogbonna are instructive. Edet-Akpan subjected his daughter to
inhumane treatment because his pastor reportedly told him that the
six-year-old little girl was a witch and, therefore, responsible for his
lack of progress. Ogbonna, on his own, killed his 60-year-old father,
following a prophesy by his pastor that his father was mystically
manipulating his destiny, thereby making it impossible for him to make
progress in life like his colleagues.
Political leaders are also guilty of
unduly raising the people’s hope. They not only tell you that tomorrow
will be better, they also promise that they will make it so. Their ideal
period for launching their message of hope is the campaign season, when
they promise the electorate a rosy future. Some of them could even
promise to construct a bridge where there is no river at all. President
Goodluck Jonathan is such a politician. He bombarded Nigerians with
messages of hope in his declaration speech in 2010 as well as his
campaign and inauguration speeches in 2011.
Yet, none of Jonathan’s repeated promises
of change has been satisfactorily fulfilled. How many times has
Jonathan told Nigerians to hope for better power supply from the
government even as they purchase more and more generators to power their
homes and businesses? How much improvement have we experienced on the
Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, beyond a few patches here and there, despite
repeated assurances of contract awards? Where are the jobs he promised
to create, especially for the youths?
The spiritual basis for Pastor Adeboye’s
message of hope is beyond verification. We cannot, and should not, probe
into his communication with God. However, the practical basis for
Jonathan’s hope messages is constantly being questioned, as it should
be, by citizens who continue to experience hardship nearly three years
after he assumed office. True, some Ministries, Departments, and
Agencies, such as Power, Agriculture, Aviation, and Communications
Technology have been making some progress; the overall picture is that
of hopelessness.
That’s why, today, a sense of fatalism
has befallen the people. Their hope for political and economic change
has been dashed so many times and so often that they are now resigned to
fate. This was evident in online, e-mail, and text messages in response
to my recent articles on taxation (The PUNCH, February 12 and
March 5, 2013). No matter the argument I raised to convince fellow
Nigerians to consider paying appropriate individual taxes, their
counter-arguments override their willingness to cooperate: Corruption
will continue; we will never be able to install good leaders; and the
status quo will remain in political and economic affairs. Not only are
many citizens vowing never to pay taxes, some are determined not to vote
in 2015, because they are already resigned to the idea that their vote
may not lead to a change of the status quo. The end result is that an
otherwise happy and hopeful people have become unhappy and hopeless.
History teaches us that unhappy and
hopeless people often become angry, rebellious, riotous, and violent.
Their anger often leads to revolt, which may eventuate in a civil war.
The recent protests in Europe over the sovereign debt crisis were
relatively mild, although they still led to power shifts in eight out of
17 Eurozone countries. More sustained revolutions were much more
devastating for the ruling class and often involved high casualties.
Leading cases include the American Revolutionary War (1775-1783); the
French Revolution (1789-1799); and more recently, the Arab Spring. The
underlying causes of such revolutions—economic crisis, mass poverty,
rampant corruption, and the stronghold on power by an inclusive
political class—are all present in Nigeria. They are the reasons why
Nigerians are now unhappy and hopeless today.
Whether or how they will control their
anger over the next few years depends partly on the behaviour of the
political class, especially as the 2015 presidential election
approaches, and partly on the citizens’ ability to organise and mobilise
for change.
No comments:
Post a Comment